Certified Performance Analysis
for Embedded Systems Designers
EEMBC Update - February 2010
EEMBC's Shay Gal-On will join David Kleidermacher (Chief Technology Officer, Green Hills Software) in presenting the tutorial "How to Choose a Multicore Processor for Embedded Networking Devices" at the Embedded Systems Conference and Multicore Expo. The tutorial will take place Monday (April 26, 2010) 1:00pm - 5:00pm. Note: Friday February 19 is the last day to register to take advantage of the early bird pricing.
On February 24th, Shay Gal-On (EEMBC) and Michael Githens (Ixia) will co-present "Analyzing a Platform's TCP Performance and Compliance" at the Ethernet Summit" in San Jose. We will also be demonstrating a new benchmark at this event so be sure to stop by our booth.
EEMBC RSS Feeds
Keep up-to-date on EEMBC New Benchmarks, News, and Events. EEMBC has
implemented RSS feeds on its website.
Signup now to stay informed…
EEMBC adds blog to the website
Come see what we've got to say; we'd also
like to hear from you. To post, click on Blog menu, then click login. You can choose to post a blog for EEMBC, Coremark or both. Only EEMBC members can post, but anybody is invited to comment and the dialog will be informative.
We welcome two new board members this month: Andes Technology from Taiwan and Advanced Digital Chips from Korea.
Free EnergyBench available with licensing of any EEMBC benchmark suite.
A. There are 76 scores posted to the CoreMark website. Here are some of the most recent ones posted:
• MIPS 34K @ 1MHz with gcc 4.5.0 (running in simulation)
• Texas Instruments OMAP3530 @ 500MHz with GCC4.3.3
• Freescale iMX25 @ 398MHz with GCC4.2.0 20070413
• Texas Instruments MSP430FG4618 @ 8 MHz with IAR C/C++
for MSP430
4.21.2.20066
• Atmel ATmega644 @ 20 MHz with avr-gcc-4.3.2
• Tilera TILEPro64 (TLR36480BG-9C) @ 866MHz with GCCEDG gcc 3.2 mode
(tile-cc 2.1)
• Xilinx MicroBlaze in Spartan XC3S700A FPGA @ 62.5MHz with gcc 4.1.1
B. We've added a new feature to allow you to vote on scores. Do you agree
with the score? Could it have been run
with a better configuration (i.e. different compiler, better compiler
flags)? View the CoreMark scores and tell us what you
think (look for the Thumbs-up and Thumbs-down symbols).